雅思考试主要是通过对考生听、说、读、写四个方面英语能力的考核，综合测评考生的英语沟通运用能力，实现“沟通为本”的考试理念。对于雅思考生来说，也有很多考试难点和政策盲区需要帮助解答。今天雅思无忧网小编准备了雅思作文范文:接种病毒疫苗，希望通过文章来解决雅思考生这方面的疑难问题，敬请关注。
雅思考试中写作部分的考察很重要，又很难在短时间内提分，就更需要大家用功在平时。下面是听力课堂小编整理的雅思作文范文:接种病毒疫苗的资料，平时多看多练，考试正常发挥就好。
Should parents be obliged to immunise their children against childhood
diseases? Or do individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their
children?
Model Answer 1:
Some people argue that the state does not have the right to make parents
immunise their children. However, I feel the question is not whether they should
immunise but whether, as members of society, they have the right not to.
Preventative medicine has proved to be the most effective way of reducing
the incidence of fatal childhood diseases. As a result of the widespread
practice of immunising young children in our society, many lives have been saved
and the diseases have been reduced to almost zero.
In previous centuries children died from ordinary illnesses such as
influenza and tuberculosis and because few people had immunity, the diseases
spread easily. Diseases such as dysentery were the result of poor hygiene but
these have long been eradicated since the arrival of good sanitation and clean
water. Nobody would suggest that we should reverse this good practice now
because dysentery has been wiped out.
Serious diseases such as polio and smallpox have also been eradicated
through national immunisation programmes. In consequence, children not immunised
are far less at risk in this disease-free society than they would otherwise be.
Parents choosing not to immunise are relying on the fact that the diseases have
already been eradicated. If the number of parents choosing not to immunise
increased, there would be a similar increase in the risk of the diseases
returning.
Immunisation is not an issue like seatbelts which affects only the
individual. A decision not to immunise will have widespread repercussions for
the whole of society and for this reason, I do not believe that individuals have
the right to stand aside. In my opinion immunisation should be obligatory.
Model Answer 2:
The issue of whether we should force parents to immunise their children
against common diseases is, in my opinion, a social rather than a medical
question. Since we are free to choose what we expose our bodies to in the way of
food, drink, or religion for that matter, why should the question of medical
'treatment' be any different?
Medical researchers and governments are primarily interested in overall
statistics and trends and in money-saving schemes which fail to take into
consideration the individual's concerns and rights. While immunisation against
diseases such as tetanus and whooping cough may be effective, little information
is released about the harmful effects of vaccinations which can sometimes result
in stunted growth or even death.
The body is designed to resist disease and to create its own natural
immunity through contact with that disease. So when children are given
artificial immunity, we create a vulnerable society which is entirely dependent
on immunisation. In the event that mass immunisation programmes were to cease,
the society as a whole would be more at risk than ever before.
In addition there is the issue of the rights of the individual. As members
of a society, why should we be obliged to subject our children to this
potentially harmful practice? Some people may also be against immunisation on
religious grounds and their needs must also be considered.
For these reasons I feel strongly that immunisation programmes should not
be obligatory and that the individual should have the right to choose whether or
not to participate.
以上就是雅思作文范文:接种病毒疫苗的全部资料，如果喜欢，记得收藏哦！
以上就是雅思无忧网为您准备的访问雅思无忧网(https://m.yasi.cn/)，了解更多雅思考试新消息，新动态。
免责声明：文章内容来自网络，如有侵权请及时联系删除。
